University of British Columbia
PHY420 -- 2017/2018
Abdullah Abdulqader
On which of the four paths shown in the following figure would a ball roll down from point A to point B and end up with the highest velocity at point B?
This webpage documents my attempt to answer the question above using a physics demonstration that I built.
This demonstration aims to improve students’ understanding of the following concepts:
This demonstration aims to improve students’ understanding of the following concepts:
Students are expected to have a good background on the following:
After this demonstration, students are expected to be able to:
The following are the components of this physics demonstration, only the first component requires construction:
I constructed the tracks using a laser cutter to get the curves to be as smooth and continuous as possible. But you can construct it any way you want. Here are some design details:
This is how one of my tracks looked like:
A quick demonstration of rolling the ball down the tracks will be done to show them how the set up works, then, in the first round of predictions, students will be asked the following question: On which track would the ball gain the largest velocity when it reaches the bottom of the track?
The goal here is not to correct the students’ answers, but to get them to gain their attention and excitement.
Students will be asked to suggest ways to measure the velocity of the ball. I will show them the tools I have: a ruler and timer gates. How the timer gates work will be explained to them.
Once the setup is ready to measure the velocity of the ball down the tracks, the demonstration will be repeated three times for each track and the average velocity of each track will be recorded. Of course, why the average is taken will be explained.
Hopefully, if the friction of the tracks were not an issue, the average velocities should agree to some degree. Now, the real topic of the demonstration can be motivated: Why do the velocities agree?
In this part of the presentation, the principle of conservation of mechanical energy is introduced. First, students will be reminded of what energy, potential energy, and kinetic energy mean. Then, The principle of conservation of mechanical energy will be introduced along with the related equations. The goal here is to deliver the concept and show how it can be used to solve simple physics problems.
The mechanical energy E of a system is the sum of its potential energy U and the kinetic energy K. The mechanical energy is conserved as long as the forces acting on the system are conservative.
The potential energy of the ball at the top of the tracks is the same for all tracks because the height of the tracks is equal. The gained kinetic energy from all tracks is, theoretically, the same because the balls end up in the same height (setting the reference point to be the bottom of the tracks).
U_i + K_i = U_f + K_f
U_i + 0 = 0 + K_f
mgh_i = 0.5mv_f^2
v_f = √(2gh)
The theoretical outcome is then v_f=√(2*9.81m/s^2 *0.5m)=3.132m/s. This outcome will be compared to the measured velocities.
Why is the measured velocity less than the theoretical velocity? Students will be asked to brainstorm together and write down their answers in their worksheet. After listening to some of their answers, I will explain how friction from the tracks and air drag slow down the ball:
U_i + K_i = U_f + K_f + Heat
U_i + 0 = 0 + K_f + Heat
mgh_i - Heat= 0.5mv_f^2
mgh_i > 0.5mv_f^2
v_f < √(2gh)
Theoretically, the mass of the ball should not affect the final velocity. But it could produce more friction with the tracks. A heavier ball is rolled down the tracks and the measured velocity will be compared to the expected outcome.
Given that the fourth track has a dip, it should challenge the students’ ability to apply the principle of conservation of energy. Specifically, their ability to understand that all that matters when applying this principle is the initial and final height of the ball and not the path it took. Again, the expected and observed outcome will be compared and discussed.
The fourth track, however, will produce the largest amount of friction because the dip will produce some centripetal acceleration, which will increase the normal force and therefore increase the friction between the ball and the track.
An important goal of the presentation is to encourage students to develop their critical thinking skills by asking questions such as: why does the ball have less average final velocity on the third and fourth track than the first two tracks? How does the size of the gap in a track affect the energy of the rolling ball, what does it have to do with rotational energy? How does the distance between the timer gates affect the time measurements?